Earlier this year I wrote that cancer brings out the best in people. (4.2.09) Last weekend, I experienced yet more proof that's true.
On Sunday morning I was one of 2,500 women going around Windsor Racecourse on the annual Race for Life for Cancer Research UK. That was one of three races in Windsor, and one of hundreds across the country. The money raised for this great cause must be prodigious. (Thanks to all my friends for boosting my personal total to £1,175.) It wasn't the fund raising success that impressed me, however, but the general spirit of the day.First, the cheerfulness. I have rarely been in a happier crowd, or one more excited to be embarking on a task at hand. And yet the second, contrasting mood was a somber respect. Each racer bore a label on her back commemorating whoever she was racing for. I was fortunate enough to have a living, cancer-fighting mother behind me. But far too many of those labels were in memoriam, reminding us of the horror of the disease we were all fighting. Which then kindled the third emotion: Defiance. It was a group of fighters, confident we could stop cancer in its tracks.
My companions were friends from Weight Watchers, and between us we drummed up several thousand for the cause. We also had a great time, from the goofy warm up acts to our delight over the Nivea-sponsored goodie bags at the finish line. Bethan's contribution of pink bubble-blowing guns for the gang added to the festivities. For me, the best part of the day was hearing the emcee list all the good cancer statistics. Women with breast cancer are living longer, with 64% making it to 20 years these days as opposed to 44% in the early '90s. We're finding all kinds of cancers sooner, survival rates are going up. Clearly, all this cheerful, well-funded defiance is doing some good.
This is, perhaps, what all athletic endeavors for charity feel like. I wouldn't know, because this was my first. Before my own bout with cancer, my favourite exercise wavered between lifting a wine glass to my lips and turning the pages of a book. (I had great finger strength and dexterity.) I was happy to sponsor others, but couldn't imagine doing this sort of thing myself. Now that I've started to take my health seriously, however, a brisk 5k walk is no big deal. In fact, it's a fine celebration of my own victory over the disease. I'm even contemplating working up to a jog next year.
More than 950 articles on travel, fine dining, good wines, art and culture. Mostly European, with some further afield. If you’re using a mobile device you’re probably only seeing a handful of the most recent posts. Switch to a desktop browser or scroll to the bottom and click “view web version” to see the search function, archives and location-specific collections of articles.
Thursday, 30 July 2009
Friday, 24 July 2009
Stoppard's Arcadia sets brain fizzing with delight
I cannot remember many stage plays, no matter how engaging, that I would have immediately rewound and sat through again if given the opportunity. On Tuesday night, however, I walked out of the Duke of Yorks theatre with just one thought in my mind: "I want to see it again. Now!"
The play is Arcadia, Tom Stoppard's 1993 romp through landscape architecture, mathematics, love, comedy and drama. Yes, it's all in there. Delivered with sparkling wit and rapid-fire repartee that pushes your brain through a proper workout, while delighting it at the same time.
There's no denying that you have to be a bit of an intellectual to appreciate Stoppard. Certainly a great many of the jokes in Arcadia fall flat without some grasp of garden history, the life of Byron, algebra and chaos theory. The more you know to start, the more amazed you'll be by the way Stoppard has wound all his clever threads together. I'm rock solid on the first two topics, flunked the third in ninth grade and have only a dim comprehension of the last.
The beauty of Stoppard, with this level of awareness, is that you can pat yourself on the back for knowing about the bits you know, and feel educated by the bits you don't. I loved the wordplay so much I believe I might have comprehended algebra ... or at least understood why the hell I was forced to study it ... if Stoppard had been my teacher. There are a lot of parallels between this work and Shakespeare in Love. That was a fun story, but the more you know about the bard, the more you appreciated the nuances. If you liked the film as much as I did, you'll probably be an Arcadia fan.
Arcadia explores a mystery in an English country house, bouncing back and forth between the present-day academics who are researching the past, and the Regency family living the real story. The two-time period historical mystery has become a bit hackneyed today (seems like every paperback I pick up these days has the same set up), but when Stoppard introduced this play it was still fairly fresh. Much of the humour comes from the audience being one step ahead of the academics; because we are watching the past unfold, we know how they're going wrong, and what fools they may soon make of themselves. Besides telling an amusing story in magnificently clever language, Stoppard gives us devastatingly incisive character sketches. The precocious child growing to adulthood, squabbling academics, the socially awkward English aristocrat, the fawning bourgeois begging for aristocratic favour; all the stereotypes are here, but injected with new depth and truth.Of course, no matter how good a play, it's only as good as its production. And this one fulfills all the potential of its author's brilliance. The veteran cast presents no superstars, but rather familiar faces with long CVs you've seen in plenty of television and movie productions. (Interesting to note how the Harry Potter series is developing British talent. Two of the young leads are familiar from those films.) I first saw Arcadia in Dallas. I loved it then, but it was only in a production filled with a top quality British cast that I picked up all the nuances of social class. I don't think Americans, without living here for a while, can grasp or adequately present the mannerisms on show here. Much less the accents. I was particularly fond of Ed Stoppard (yes, the author's son ... above left), who did the emotionally stunted English public school boy with a painful believability, and of Dan Stevens' tutor (above centre), who balanced the rapier-like wit and sexual adventuring of the Regency playboy with a poignant underlying sensitivity.
Despite the need for fiscal responsibility, am seriously considering getting tickets to see Arcadia again before the end of its run. I am sure that, no matter how much I was drinking in the dialogue, at least 30 per cent of it rushed through my fizzing brain before I could grasp and appreciate it. In the mean time, I'll just pour myself a glass of wine and pop Shakespeare in Love into the DVD player. Either way, my brain will be delighted with the exercise.
The play is Arcadia, Tom Stoppard's 1993 romp through landscape architecture, mathematics, love, comedy and drama. Yes, it's all in there. Delivered with sparkling wit and rapid-fire repartee that pushes your brain through a proper workout, while delighting it at the same time.
There's no denying that you have to be a bit of an intellectual to appreciate Stoppard. Certainly a great many of the jokes in Arcadia fall flat without some grasp of garden history, the life of Byron, algebra and chaos theory. The more you know to start, the more amazed you'll be by the way Stoppard has wound all his clever threads together. I'm rock solid on the first two topics, flunked the third in ninth grade and have only a dim comprehension of the last.
The beauty of Stoppard, with this level of awareness, is that you can pat yourself on the back for knowing about the bits you know, and feel educated by the bits you don't. I loved the wordplay so much I believe I might have comprehended algebra ... or at least understood why the hell I was forced to study it ... if Stoppard had been my teacher. There are a lot of parallels between this work and Shakespeare in Love. That was a fun story, but the more you know about the bard, the more you appreciated the nuances. If you liked the film as much as I did, you'll probably be an Arcadia fan.
Arcadia explores a mystery in an English country house, bouncing back and forth between the present-day academics who are researching the past, and the Regency family living the real story. The two-time period historical mystery has become a bit hackneyed today (seems like every paperback I pick up these days has the same set up), but when Stoppard introduced this play it was still fairly fresh. Much of the humour comes from the audience being one step ahead of the academics; because we are watching the past unfold, we know how they're going wrong, and what fools they may soon make of themselves. Besides telling an amusing story in magnificently clever language, Stoppard gives us devastatingly incisive character sketches. The precocious child growing to adulthood, squabbling academics, the socially awkward English aristocrat, the fawning bourgeois begging for aristocratic favour; all the stereotypes are here, but injected with new depth and truth.Of course, no matter how good a play, it's only as good as its production. And this one fulfills all the potential of its author's brilliance. The veteran cast presents no superstars, but rather familiar faces with long CVs you've seen in plenty of television and movie productions. (Interesting to note how the Harry Potter series is developing British talent. Two of the young leads are familiar from those films.) I first saw Arcadia in Dallas. I loved it then, but it was only in a production filled with a top quality British cast that I picked up all the nuances of social class. I don't think Americans, without living here for a while, can grasp or adequately present the mannerisms on show here. Much less the accents. I was particularly fond of Ed Stoppard (yes, the author's son ... above left), who did the emotionally stunted English public school boy with a painful believability, and of Dan Stevens' tutor (above centre), who balanced the rapier-like wit and sexual adventuring of the Regency playboy with a poignant underlying sensitivity.
Despite the need for fiscal responsibility, am seriously considering getting tickets to see Arcadia again before the end of its run. I am sure that, no matter how much I was drinking in the dialogue, at least 30 per cent of it rushed through my fizzing brain before I could grasp and appreciate it. In the mean time, I'll just pour myself a glass of wine and pop Shakespeare in Love into the DVD player. Either way, my brain will be delighted with the exercise.
Sunday, 19 July 2009
Cricket and opera make strange bedfellows, but a fine week
Brits are good at summer. From the opening of the Chelsea Flower Show to the early September return to school, the national social calendar is packed at a manic pace not approached again until Christmas party season. Music festivals, sporting blockbusters, historical festivals, special openings, summer balls, more flower shows ... there's no week without its opportunity to celebrate and indulge. I figure it's the Dunkirk Spirit in action. Summer weather is often so dire it feels like a blustery March day. In most other countries, this weather would shut down outdoor events. We ignore it and carry on with increased levity, just to prove we can.
This week proved so busy I actually had to take a day off work to fit it all in.
Notable events started on Wednesday night in Trafalgar Square, when a friend and I joined a thousand or so others for the live screening of Barber of Seville from the Royal Opera House. This was the last of a three-opera set of free broadcasts beamed to high-profile gathering places around the country. Sponsored by BP and, I suspect, done by the ROH partially to defray accusations of tax support for an institution with few affordable tickets, it is one of the best value-for-money events you'll see in London all summer. There are other freebies, of course, but few of this profile and quality.
The screen is impressively large, and boasts a sharp enough image to make you forget you are outside once the action starts. The sound system is robust enough to drown out all but the noisiest of the traffic edging the square. We suspected an early arrival was in order and, indeed, most decent seats were taken by 6:30, an hour before the curtain rose. Our 6:15 entry saw us in pretty much perfect position, perched at the bottom of the central steps leading down from the National Gallery.
The production was fantastic. American soprano Joyce DiDonato is the musical heroine of the summer, breaking her leg during a fall on opening night, carrying on 'til curtain that evening and finishing the rest of the season from a wheelchair that's been seamlessly choreographed into the staging. Peruvian tenor Juan Diego Florez is not only a fine actor with a rich voice, but that rarest of things: a darkly handsome, sexy and fanciable opera lead. The rest of the cast was equally strong, the favourite arias delivered with zest, the staging innovative and fun. You'd expect that of the Royal Opera House, of course, but their usual quality was enhanced by the skillful video production. It was at least comparable to being there (see 30.5.08 and 24.1.09 entries), and certainly better for picking up details than my usual seats near the roof.
The only drawback, of course, was the weather. The planned elegance of our picnic drowned beneath waves of pounding rain. We huddled under plastic ponchos, sitting on cushions soaking up ever more water, trying to stretch covers to protect not only ourselves and the food, but the jug of wine that was quickly getting watered down. Thankfully the skies wept their last just before the curtain rose, leaving us with an evening dry and warm enough to make sitting in our damp clothing for the next three hours endurable. Ignoring moisture is, after all, just another part of the British summer.
The next day, granted permission to take a spur-of-the-moment day of leave by a benevolent boss, I finally achieved my ambition to get to a cricket match. And not just any match: A friend had come up with tickets to the first day of the second Test of The Ashes.
For the benefit of my American readers ... The Ashes is a cricket tournament that takes place every other summer between the national teams of England and Australia, who play a series of five multi-day matches across the whole season. Location alternates between the two countries, with this summer's play being in the UK. This particularly potent rivalry pits the nation that invented the game and feels it should be best at it against a prickly former colony that considers sporting prowess to be an essential element of national identity. The name itself commemorates the first time England lost to Australia, in 1882, when a British newspaper cynically reported that English cricket was dead and the ashes would be taken Down Under. Ever since, the two sides have played for a tiny funerary urn and fierce national pride. Frankly, it makes any other rivalry I've seen in sport pale to dim insignificance.
This particular match took place at Lord's Cricket Ground, acknowledged as the global home of the game. Frankly, it's hard to imagine a more significant and spectacular way to be introduced to the game. I can't pretend any deep understanding, but after years of missing baseball and trying to grasp cricket as a substitute, I think I've reached a decent level of comprehension. Certainly enough to sit there happily and maintain interest over seven hours, thanks to an exciting match, great seats in a beautiful, historic sporting ground and good weather. But even more so thanks to my host, a walking compendium of cricketing knowledge who was happy to answer all my endless questions and, essentially, be my own personal commentator. (Sadly, he is also Australian, thus was having a particularly difficult day as England trounced the visitors.)
I won't even attempt to explain the game itself to the Americans. If you're really interested, check out http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~crikclub/modules/xoopsfaq/index.php?cat_id=2 where you'll find an unusually comprehensible introduction using baseball for comparison. Basically ... if you're the kind of person who can watch nine innings of scoreless baseball yet still enjoy it because of the nuances of fine defensive work and the battle between pitcher and batter, you'll probably be able to grasp the appeal of cricket with a bit of work. If you're the type of person who thinks baseball is boring to start, then cricket will be a unique and lengthy form of torture.
While I still prefer my native game, I emerged from my cricket initiation charmed, enthusiastic and curious for more. Although how my next outing will match the drama of my initiation, I can't imagine.
There was little time to ponder that challenge on the day, however, as the busy social diary left me less than two hours to emerge from the cricketing crowds, get across town, change into formal wear and slide into my seat for dinner at the Hurlingham Club. The event was the International Advertising Association summer ball, and the throngs of prosperous-looking professionals in tuxedos and bright gowns downing fine wine seemed to challenge any thought of recession. More Dunkirk Spirit?
The Hurlingham is a particularly lovely place, a gracious Georgian country house set in 42 acres along the Thames in Fulham. I have, thanks to friends who are members, been here several times before. It was on those visits that I realised this is the archetype for every American country club I've ever entered. All it needed was a surrounding golf course and some high school kids drinking illicit beer beneath the trees, and I could have been back at prom. That feeling was heightened by the '80s theme of the evening. I didn't know whether to be pleased or a bit disturbed that the evening's music seemed to be identical with the "most played" list on my iPod.
The exclusive club feel was somewhat diminished by our immediate surroundings. The Hurlingham has added a modern party wing to their sophisticated country house. It's spacious, bright, efficient ... and a bit like partying in a shopping mall. I wouldn't have noticed so much, I suspect, if I didn't have prior knowledge of the beauty and dignity of the rooms in the main wing. As a business proposition for the club, this wing no doubt makes great sense. As a party organiser, I'd think twice before booking it for posh exclusivity. The party rooms are not much different than a central London hotel, in a location that is much more problematic to get to and from.
Despite that critique, I had a lovely night filled with engaging conversations with my hosts from The Economist. I could happily have stayed until the wee hours, especially given a soundtrack that was enticing me towards the dance floor with memories of long nights at the Phi Kappa Sigma fraternity house. But regressing to youthful mayhem didn't seem like the right level of behaviour to display in front of my hosts. And, frankly, after 30 hours packed with social highlights, I really needed to go to bed. A quiet stint at my desk came as a welcome relief the next day. I can, after all, only keep up this Dunkirk Spirit stuff for so long.
This week proved so busy I actually had to take a day off work to fit it all in.
Notable events started on Wednesday night in Trafalgar Square, when a friend and I joined a thousand or so others for the live screening of Barber of Seville from the Royal Opera House. This was the last of a three-opera set of free broadcasts beamed to high-profile gathering places around the country. Sponsored by BP and, I suspect, done by the ROH partially to defray accusations of tax support for an institution with few affordable tickets, it is one of the best value-for-money events you'll see in London all summer. There are other freebies, of course, but few of this profile and quality.
The screen is impressively large, and boasts a sharp enough image to make you forget you are outside once the action starts. The sound system is robust enough to drown out all but the noisiest of the traffic edging the square. We suspected an early arrival was in order and, indeed, most decent seats were taken by 6:30, an hour before the curtain rose. Our 6:15 entry saw us in pretty much perfect position, perched at the bottom of the central steps leading down from the National Gallery.
The production was fantastic. American soprano Joyce DiDonato is the musical heroine of the summer, breaking her leg during a fall on opening night, carrying on 'til curtain that evening and finishing the rest of the season from a wheelchair that's been seamlessly choreographed into the staging. Peruvian tenor Juan Diego Florez is not only a fine actor with a rich voice, but that rarest of things: a darkly handsome, sexy and fanciable opera lead. The rest of the cast was equally strong, the favourite arias delivered with zest, the staging innovative and fun. You'd expect that of the Royal Opera House, of course, but their usual quality was enhanced by the skillful video production. It was at least comparable to being there (see 30.5.08 and 24.1.09 entries), and certainly better for picking up details than my usual seats near the roof.
The only drawback, of course, was the weather. The planned elegance of our picnic drowned beneath waves of pounding rain. We huddled under plastic ponchos, sitting on cushions soaking up ever more water, trying to stretch covers to protect not only ourselves and the food, but the jug of wine that was quickly getting watered down. Thankfully the skies wept their last just before the curtain rose, leaving us with an evening dry and warm enough to make sitting in our damp clothing for the next three hours endurable. Ignoring moisture is, after all, just another part of the British summer.
The next day, granted permission to take a spur-of-the-moment day of leave by a benevolent boss, I finally achieved my ambition to get to a cricket match. And not just any match: A friend had come up with tickets to the first day of the second Test of The Ashes.
For the benefit of my American readers ... The Ashes is a cricket tournament that takes place every other summer between the national teams of England and Australia, who play a series of five multi-day matches across the whole season. Location alternates between the two countries, with this summer's play being in the UK. This particularly potent rivalry pits the nation that invented the game and feels it should be best at it against a prickly former colony that considers sporting prowess to be an essential element of national identity. The name itself commemorates the first time England lost to Australia, in 1882, when a British newspaper cynically reported that English cricket was dead and the ashes would be taken Down Under. Ever since, the two sides have played for a tiny funerary urn and fierce national pride. Frankly, it makes any other rivalry I've seen in sport pale to dim insignificance.
This particular match took place at Lord's Cricket Ground, acknowledged as the global home of the game. Frankly, it's hard to imagine a more significant and spectacular way to be introduced to the game. I can't pretend any deep understanding, but after years of missing baseball and trying to grasp cricket as a substitute, I think I've reached a decent level of comprehension. Certainly enough to sit there happily and maintain interest over seven hours, thanks to an exciting match, great seats in a beautiful, historic sporting ground and good weather. But even more so thanks to my host, a walking compendium of cricketing knowledge who was happy to answer all my endless questions and, essentially, be my own personal commentator. (Sadly, he is also Australian, thus was having a particularly difficult day as England trounced the visitors.)
I won't even attempt to explain the game itself to the Americans. If you're really interested, check out http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~crikclub/modules/xoopsfaq/index.php?cat_id=2 where you'll find an unusually comprehensible introduction using baseball for comparison. Basically ... if you're the kind of person who can watch nine innings of scoreless baseball yet still enjoy it because of the nuances of fine defensive work and the battle between pitcher and batter, you'll probably be able to grasp the appeal of cricket with a bit of work. If you're the type of person who thinks baseball is boring to start, then cricket will be a unique and lengthy form of torture.
While I still prefer my native game, I emerged from my cricket initiation charmed, enthusiastic and curious for more. Although how my next outing will match the drama of my initiation, I can't imagine.
There was little time to ponder that challenge on the day, however, as the busy social diary left me less than two hours to emerge from the cricketing crowds, get across town, change into formal wear and slide into my seat for dinner at the Hurlingham Club. The event was the International Advertising Association summer ball, and the throngs of prosperous-looking professionals in tuxedos and bright gowns downing fine wine seemed to challenge any thought of recession. More Dunkirk Spirit?
The Hurlingham is a particularly lovely place, a gracious Georgian country house set in 42 acres along the Thames in Fulham. I have, thanks to friends who are members, been here several times before. It was on those visits that I realised this is the archetype for every American country club I've ever entered. All it needed was a surrounding golf course and some high school kids drinking illicit beer beneath the trees, and I could have been back at prom. That feeling was heightened by the '80s theme of the evening. I didn't know whether to be pleased or a bit disturbed that the evening's music seemed to be identical with the "most played" list on my iPod.
The exclusive club feel was somewhat diminished by our immediate surroundings. The Hurlingham has added a modern party wing to their sophisticated country house. It's spacious, bright, efficient ... and a bit like partying in a shopping mall. I wouldn't have noticed so much, I suspect, if I didn't have prior knowledge of the beauty and dignity of the rooms in the main wing. As a business proposition for the club, this wing no doubt makes great sense. As a party organiser, I'd think twice before booking it for posh exclusivity. The party rooms are not much different than a central London hotel, in a location that is much more problematic to get to and from.
Despite that critique, I had a lovely night filled with engaging conversations with my hosts from The Economist. I could happily have stayed until the wee hours, especially given a soundtrack that was enticing me towards the dance floor with memories of long nights at the Phi Kappa Sigma fraternity house. But regressing to youthful mayhem didn't seem like the right level of behaviour to display in front of my hosts. And, frankly, after 30 hours packed with social highlights, I really needed to go to bed. A quiet stint at my desk came as a welcome relief the next day. I can, after all, only keep up this Dunkirk Spirit stuff for so long.
Sunday, 12 July 2009
Fat Duck retains power to amaze and delight on second visit
Eating at what's been ranked the best restaurant on the planet is quite a blessing. Doing it twice, frankly, is an embarrassment of riches. I'll just have to acknowledge my shame, admit that life is good and share it with you.
And so it's back once more to the Fat Duck, Heston Blumenthal's gastronomic Mecca ranked No. 2 this year behind Spain's El Bulli and just ahead of Denmark's Noma. Of course, it helps that this place is local. So while getting a table requires a significant amount of effort (making the attempt exactly two months in advance as reservations open, trying repeatedly to get through on the phone, then taking whatever you can get before all the tables are gone within an hour or two), getting there is a quick 10-minute ride. Subtracting the average cost of travel most gastronomes rack up in order to visit these famous establishments, you could almost call our outing a bargain.
Regular readers may remember my first visit (see 15.01.08); certainly it's the gold standard by which I have measured every fine meal since. A few have gotten close, and the reviewers who make up those rankings should certainly spend more time in Luxembourg. But when it comes to the overall experience, combining taste with theatre, exquisite ingredients with creativity, food spectacle with chemical innovation, the Fat Duck simply can't be beat.
This was, to a large extent, a repeat of my first visit. These days an a la carte menu isn't even available. If you're going, you're there for the 13-course tasting menu. In for a penny, in for £130 pounds. Which, I must point out, amortised at a tenner a course ... isn't half bad.
A little over half the menu was a repeat of what I had the last time, one assumes first because there are some trademark dishes that everyone wants, and second because you don't get a lot of regulars pushing for variety at this kind of "destination" restaurant. The showstoppers of forest and sea still anchor the menu: the first a quail jelly, langoustine cream and chicken liver parfait served in a swirling mist of oak moss; the second a mix of seafood, seaweed and froth that appears to be lying on a bed of sand. The at-the-table showmanship of the liquid nitrogen preparation turns up in the frozen lime meringue palate cleanser and Blumenthal's iconic nitro-scrambled egg and bacon ice cream. See the original review for more detail on these dishes.
But it's clear that the master never stops tinkering. Other dishes were similar to my first visit but had been enhanced. The salmon poached in a thin film of liquorice (at right), which I found underwhelming the first time, was now mouth-meltingly memorable. This, I suspect was due to the addition of dollops of vanilla mayonnaise (bliss) and roasted artichoke hearts. Anjou pigeon turned up again, this time as a delicately presented breast served with blood pudding and a confit of umbles. Which, it turns out, is pigeon hearts. Which sounds positively vile. But the offal side of the dish was so subtle it merely added a richness to the fowl rather than a distinct additional flavour. All nicely counter-balanced by the deep cherry and berry flavours of the Bordeaux we were drinking at the time.
My only great disappointment on the return items was the wine gums. Somehow I thought they were just that bit more amazing when they were taking you through the range of single malts. This year they celebrate the Historic Trade Routes of Britain, with flavours like mead, cognac and rum. Good, but except for the cognac I didn't have the feeling I'd had last year that a piece of candy was transforming into a drink as it metamorphosised on my tongue.
Of the entirely new dishes, the most visually arresting was the mock turtle soup, aka "Mad Hatter Tea". First came a large white tea cup. Lying within it was a gold pocket watch (remember the White Rabbit?), actually a moulded, concentrated stock that would become the soup, covered with gold leaf. Next the boiling water, which fragments the gold into a score of dazzling shards and triggers the creation of a dark broth. Finally, that gets poured over a dish in which sits a mound that appeared to be an egg with tiny mushrooms protruding from it, next to a striped rectangle that turned out to be layered ox tongue and Italian lardo. With the addition of the stock this became a swirling, quite bizarre visual feast ... pretty much exactly what you'd expect food to be like after you'd swigged some of the psychedelic drugs that sent Alice to Wonderland in the first place. And the taste? Good, but probably my least favourite of the night. The theatre was amazing, the tastes just average. And, frankly, I've never felt comfortable with the idea of eating real gold. It seems the ultimate in waste; the kind of thing consumed by people whose peasants are plotting to burn down the castle.
My taste prizes go to two new dishes. In the savoury category, three delicate little morsels of roast foie gras, sitting atop an opalescent film of a type of seaweed called konbu, separated by almost translucent shards of crab biscuit, with a dash of gooseberry sauce on the side to cut the richness of the dish. In this case a strange combination that really worked, and proof that a dish only needs to be a few tiny mouthfuls to sate your taste for something. This was, after all, only course four of the 13. Ninth along the way, and first of the sweet courses, was the dish most widely acclaimed at the table: Taffaty tart. This delicate pastry, layered with caramelized apple, fennel, rose and candied lemon, was an explosive taste sensation and, unlike the foie gras, could easily have been consumed in a "normal" sized slice. But when you have five dessert courses to get through, you have to thank the chef for the wisdom of his portion control. Even if you also craved seconds on the millionaire's shortbread and chocolate wine slush that came later.
To go along with this mind numbing, palate caressing meal, we opted for the least expensive of the three wine tasting menus. Having done the maths and considered what the wine bill could be if five drinkers went by-the-bottle over the course of four hours off a wine list where "cheap" was £45, we decided that £90 per person for the eight glasses that matched the meal actually represented fiscal prudence. Or, at least, avoidance of extreme irresponsibility and the potential for things to get badly out of control. The pairings were interesting, often unusual but in each case bringing out accents of the food beautifully. (For example, a mildly aniseed-flavoured sake to go with the "sound of the sea".)
Two wines stood out as remarkable. a 2001 Quinta da Lada from Casa Ferreirinha in the Douro Valley had all the character and richness of its cousin port, but in the form of a classic red wine. The 2006 Breganze Torcolato, from Maculan in the Veneto, has bumped the Kiwis from first place on my favourite dessert wine list. Sweet yet not overpowering, with elements of honey, flowers and vanilla, I would happily end every meal this way. Unlikely, however, as I see from their website that the family only produces 2000 bottles of this nectar each year. Perhaps it's time for a shopping trip to Venice?
The most unusual pairing of this whole meal, however, was that of the group around the table with the event itself. This visit to one of the world's most extra-ordinary restaurants, to indulge in a feast that would trigger comfort levels with Louis XIV or the tsars of Russia, was organised and attended by my buddies from Weight Watchers. Six women sat around that wildly indulgent table, between us celebrating a loss of 232 pounds. (Of course, that would have been a bit less the next morning.) Some of us have made our goals, some have a long road still ahead. The ethos of Weight Watchers, and one of the reasons I believe it works so well, is that it doesn't prohibit anything and it understands that the occasional treat is what makes life worth living.
Granted, our interpretation of "treat" might have been a bit lavish. But life goes on. And the memory of that roast foie gras is going to carry me through a lot of salads, melba toast and strenuous bike rides in the months to come.
And so it's back once more to the Fat Duck, Heston Blumenthal's gastronomic Mecca ranked No. 2 this year behind Spain's El Bulli and just ahead of Denmark's Noma. Of course, it helps that this place is local. So while getting a table requires a significant amount of effort (making the attempt exactly two months in advance as reservations open, trying repeatedly to get through on the phone, then taking whatever you can get before all the tables are gone within an hour or two), getting there is a quick 10-minute ride. Subtracting the average cost of travel most gastronomes rack up in order to visit these famous establishments, you could almost call our outing a bargain.
Regular readers may remember my first visit (see 15.01.08); certainly it's the gold standard by which I have measured every fine meal since. A few have gotten close, and the reviewers who make up those rankings should certainly spend more time in Luxembourg. But when it comes to the overall experience, combining taste with theatre, exquisite ingredients with creativity, food spectacle with chemical innovation, the Fat Duck simply can't be beat.
This was, to a large extent, a repeat of my first visit. These days an a la carte menu isn't even available. If you're going, you're there for the 13-course tasting menu. In for a penny, in for £130 pounds. Which, I must point out, amortised at a tenner a course ... isn't half bad.
A little over half the menu was a repeat of what I had the last time, one assumes first because there are some trademark dishes that everyone wants, and second because you don't get a lot of regulars pushing for variety at this kind of "destination" restaurant. The showstoppers of forest and sea still anchor the menu: the first a quail jelly, langoustine cream and chicken liver parfait served in a swirling mist of oak moss; the second a mix of seafood, seaweed and froth that appears to be lying on a bed of sand. The at-the-table showmanship of the liquid nitrogen preparation turns up in the frozen lime meringue palate cleanser and Blumenthal's iconic nitro-scrambled egg and bacon ice cream. See the original review for more detail on these dishes.
But it's clear that the master never stops tinkering. Other dishes were similar to my first visit but had been enhanced. The salmon poached in a thin film of liquorice (at right), which I found underwhelming the first time, was now mouth-meltingly memorable. This, I suspect was due to the addition of dollops of vanilla mayonnaise (bliss) and roasted artichoke hearts. Anjou pigeon turned up again, this time as a delicately presented breast served with blood pudding and a confit of umbles. Which, it turns out, is pigeon hearts. Which sounds positively vile. But the offal side of the dish was so subtle it merely added a richness to the fowl rather than a distinct additional flavour. All nicely counter-balanced by the deep cherry and berry flavours of the Bordeaux we were drinking at the time.
My only great disappointment on the return items was the wine gums. Somehow I thought they were just that bit more amazing when they were taking you through the range of single malts. This year they celebrate the Historic Trade Routes of Britain, with flavours like mead, cognac and rum. Good, but except for the cognac I didn't have the feeling I'd had last year that a piece of candy was transforming into a drink as it metamorphosised on my tongue.
Of the entirely new dishes, the most visually arresting was the mock turtle soup, aka "Mad Hatter Tea". First came a large white tea cup. Lying within it was a gold pocket watch (remember the White Rabbit?), actually a moulded, concentrated stock that would become the soup, covered with gold leaf. Next the boiling water, which fragments the gold into a score of dazzling shards and triggers the creation of a dark broth. Finally, that gets poured over a dish in which sits a mound that appeared to be an egg with tiny mushrooms protruding from it, next to a striped rectangle that turned out to be layered ox tongue and Italian lardo. With the addition of the stock this became a swirling, quite bizarre visual feast ... pretty much exactly what you'd expect food to be like after you'd swigged some of the psychedelic drugs that sent Alice to Wonderland in the first place. And the taste? Good, but probably my least favourite of the night. The theatre was amazing, the tastes just average. And, frankly, I've never felt comfortable with the idea of eating real gold. It seems the ultimate in waste; the kind of thing consumed by people whose peasants are plotting to burn down the castle.
My taste prizes go to two new dishes. In the savoury category, three delicate little morsels of roast foie gras, sitting atop an opalescent film of a type of seaweed called konbu, separated by almost translucent shards of crab biscuit, with a dash of gooseberry sauce on the side to cut the richness of the dish. In this case a strange combination that really worked, and proof that a dish only needs to be a few tiny mouthfuls to sate your taste for something. This was, after all, only course four of the 13. Ninth along the way, and first of the sweet courses, was the dish most widely acclaimed at the table: Taffaty tart. This delicate pastry, layered with caramelized apple, fennel, rose and candied lemon, was an explosive taste sensation and, unlike the foie gras, could easily have been consumed in a "normal" sized slice. But when you have five dessert courses to get through, you have to thank the chef for the wisdom of his portion control. Even if you also craved seconds on the millionaire's shortbread and chocolate wine slush that came later.
To go along with this mind numbing, palate caressing meal, we opted for the least expensive of the three wine tasting menus. Having done the maths and considered what the wine bill could be if five drinkers went by-the-bottle over the course of four hours off a wine list where "cheap" was £45, we decided that £90 per person for the eight glasses that matched the meal actually represented fiscal prudence. Or, at least, avoidance of extreme irresponsibility and the potential for things to get badly out of control. The pairings were interesting, often unusual but in each case bringing out accents of the food beautifully. (For example, a mildly aniseed-flavoured sake to go with the "sound of the sea".)
Two wines stood out as remarkable. a 2001 Quinta da Lada from Casa Ferreirinha in the Douro Valley had all the character and richness of its cousin port, but in the form of a classic red wine. The 2006 Breganze Torcolato, from Maculan in the Veneto, has bumped the Kiwis from first place on my favourite dessert wine list. Sweet yet not overpowering, with elements of honey, flowers and vanilla, I would happily end every meal this way. Unlikely, however, as I see from their website that the family only produces 2000 bottles of this nectar each year. Perhaps it's time for a shopping trip to Venice?
The most unusual pairing of this whole meal, however, was that of the group around the table with the event itself. This visit to one of the world's most extra-ordinary restaurants, to indulge in a feast that would trigger comfort levels with Louis XIV or the tsars of Russia, was organised and attended by my buddies from Weight Watchers. Six women sat around that wildly indulgent table, between us celebrating a loss of 232 pounds. (Of course, that would have been a bit less the next morning.) Some of us have made our goals, some have a long road still ahead. The ethos of Weight Watchers, and one of the reasons I believe it works so well, is that it doesn't prohibit anything and it understands that the occasional treat is what makes life worth living.
Granted, our interpretation of "treat" might have been a bit lavish. But life goes on. And the memory of that roast foie gras is going to carry me through a lot of salads, melba toast and strenuous bike rides in the months to come.
Thursday, 9 July 2009
It's a dark and thoughtful year at Hampton Court
The UK's major flower shows are the horticultural equivalent of the high fashion catwalk. What appears there trickles down to the common garden centre in a few months, and soon every garden is wearing it. This year's dominant trends were for dark and unusual flowers, and (as we've already seen for a couple of years) gardens that made statements about sustainability. Rambling, water-hungry English borders with lots of bright shades were as out of fashion as hats and gloves.
I'll always prefer my colours vivid, but that didn't stop me from enjoying every moment of the show. Unlike Chelsea, Hampton Court is a much more practical, hands-on affair. The show gardens always seem to present stuff that's more manageable for the average home. The grounds are better spread to accommodate the crowds, meaning that vendors have more time to talk to you. Best of all, plants are for sale here. So you can fall in love with one of this year's trendy new introductions and immediately have it in your hands. As I did with a clear, white Leucanthemum with narrow, corkscrew-curling petals. Or, even better, go to your specialist of choice, describe the little hole you have in your garden, and get specialist help in filling it. Thank you, Bowden Hostas, for your exquisite "Touch of Class". Now I just need to keep the snails away from it.
This was the first year I'd taken off work to go on a weekday, and I may have started a new tradition for myself. In comparison to the crowded weekends, it was blissfully empty. I met two friends for lunch at Bluebeckers, a comfortable and modern bistro that had good food and friendly service at moderate prices; a huge surprise considering its prime location directly across the road from the palace gates. Our afternoon tickets gave us access from 3pm to the show's closing at 7:30, which is just about enough time to get everything in if you manage your pace carefully. Although, between our interest in the plants and our love of retail therapy, our pace sometimes slacked quite a bit.
Within a handful of show gardens it was obvious that a dark, blackish-red was the colour of the season. Hybridisers are clearly trying to breed it into a wide variety of flowers, but the colour was consistent throughout. Deep, inky, bold. Particularly striking when planted with reds and pinky-blues for contrast. Runner up in the colour stakes was a dusky pink with tones of burnt orange and brown. A subtle neutral that seemed more appropriate for home decor than floral punch, yet I did appreciate its appearance in flowers like Echinacea, where the traditional pink gets a bit boring.
I am ashamed to say, however, that I am finding nothing so boring as sustainability. We have been driving home the point about the need to save the planet at the big flower shows for at least three years. We get it. We've all seen the draught-tolerant plants and techniques, had the composting lectures, seen the clever recycled planting containers and learned the evils of using non-renewable peat moss and paving over front gardens. I would like a return to gardens planted for beauty and enjoyment, not for social purpose. But it was not to be. This year the usual Daily Mail tent (with its inevitable, traditional cottage gardens) was replaced by an area the size of a football field covered with renewable meadows, garden buildings with green roofs, an interactive education centre and organic chickens (exactly the same colour as those pinky-brown Echinaceas) scraping up an organic lawn.Thankfully, two display gardens injected something more innovative into the sustainability message. One used humour: a washing line garden in which old bras and pairs of underpants were hung and used as planting containers (above). Another artistic: Homage and respect to a fallen oak by using its dead trunk as a centrepiece and planting tiers of flowers encircling it in shades that picked up the subtleties of the ancient wood. (Top)
My favourite gardens this year were those that celebrated the ascension of Henry VIII to the throne 500 years ago. Six gardens, one for each wife, thoughtfully used plants and design to tell the story of each woman. Anne Boleyn's was rich with the symbolism of witchcraft and all those dark red flowers. Anne of Cleves' was a horticultural re-creation of the neckline and jewels of the gown in which Holbein painted her. Just across the aisle there was an apothecary's garden dominated by topiary versions of Henry's flagship, the Mary Rose. I loved it.
Despite the recession, retail seemed to be booming. Most people left the show laden with plants. The three of us added garden gloves, plant supports and chairs to the floral haul. They say in a recession, more people are staying home and devoting time and attention to their gardens. A trend that clearly was doing this year's flower show many favours. I know where I'll be on Saturday. Lovingly easing my new specimens into the waiting holes in my beds. Hope there's some sun so I can string the hammock and appreciate them once they're in. Show gardens are great, but there's nothing so satisfying as bringing it all back to your own little plot of earth.
I'll always prefer my colours vivid, but that didn't stop me from enjoying every moment of the show. Unlike Chelsea, Hampton Court is a much more practical, hands-on affair. The show gardens always seem to present stuff that's more manageable for the average home. The grounds are better spread to accommodate the crowds, meaning that vendors have more time to talk to you. Best of all, plants are for sale here. So you can fall in love with one of this year's trendy new introductions and immediately have it in your hands. As I did with a clear, white Leucanthemum with narrow, corkscrew-curling petals. Or, even better, go to your specialist of choice, describe the little hole you have in your garden, and get specialist help in filling it. Thank you, Bowden Hostas, for your exquisite "Touch of Class". Now I just need to keep the snails away from it.
This was the first year I'd taken off work to go on a weekday, and I may have started a new tradition for myself. In comparison to the crowded weekends, it was blissfully empty. I met two friends for lunch at Bluebeckers, a comfortable and modern bistro that had good food and friendly service at moderate prices; a huge surprise considering its prime location directly across the road from the palace gates. Our afternoon tickets gave us access from 3pm to the show's closing at 7:30, which is just about enough time to get everything in if you manage your pace carefully. Although, between our interest in the plants and our love of retail therapy, our pace sometimes slacked quite a bit.
Within a handful of show gardens it was obvious that a dark, blackish-red was the colour of the season. Hybridisers are clearly trying to breed it into a wide variety of flowers, but the colour was consistent throughout. Deep, inky, bold. Particularly striking when planted with reds and pinky-blues for contrast. Runner up in the colour stakes was a dusky pink with tones of burnt orange and brown. A subtle neutral that seemed more appropriate for home decor than floral punch, yet I did appreciate its appearance in flowers like Echinacea, where the traditional pink gets a bit boring.
I am ashamed to say, however, that I am finding nothing so boring as sustainability. We have been driving home the point about the need to save the planet at the big flower shows for at least three years. We get it. We've all seen the draught-tolerant plants and techniques, had the composting lectures, seen the clever recycled planting containers and learned the evils of using non-renewable peat moss and paving over front gardens. I would like a return to gardens planted for beauty and enjoyment, not for social purpose. But it was not to be. This year the usual Daily Mail tent (with its inevitable, traditional cottage gardens) was replaced by an area the size of a football field covered with renewable meadows, garden buildings with green roofs, an interactive education centre and organic chickens (exactly the same colour as those pinky-brown Echinaceas) scraping up an organic lawn.Thankfully, two display gardens injected something more innovative into the sustainability message. One used humour: a washing line garden in which old bras and pairs of underpants were hung and used as planting containers (above). Another artistic: Homage and respect to a fallen oak by using its dead trunk as a centrepiece and planting tiers of flowers encircling it in shades that picked up the subtleties of the ancient wood. (Top)
My favourite gardens this year were those that celebrated the ascension of Henry VIII to the throne 500 years ago. Six gardens, one for each wife, thoughtfully used plants and design to tell the story of each woman. Anne Boleyn's was rich with the symbolism of witchcraft and all those dark red flowers. Anne of Cleves' was a horticultural re-creation of the neckline and jewels of the gown in which Holbein painted her. Just across the aisle there was an apothecary's garden dominated by topiary versions of Henry's flagship, the Mary Rose. I loved it.
Despite the recession, retail seemed to be booming. Most people left the show laden with plants. The three of us added garden gloves, plant supports and chairs to the floral haul. They say in a recession, more people are staying home and devoting time and attention to their gardens. A trend that clearly was doing this year's flower show many favours. I know where I'll be on Saturday. Lovingly easing my new specimens into the waiting holes in my beds. Hope there's some sun so I can string the hammock and appreciate them once they're in. Show gardens are great, but there's nothing so satisfying as bringing it all back to your own little plot of earth.
Sunday, 5 July 2009
July 4th highlights delights of being the exotic foreigner
The foreign has always been exotic. Sometimes, that exoticism provokes prejudice and fear. But fortunately, more often it stimulates curiosity and excitement. At least, that's the only rational excuse I can give you for Velveeta queso dip, Ball Park Franks and Boston Baked Beans being celebrated by a bunch of Brits who, as serious foodies, should know better.
It's been a while since my last Fourth of July party. I used to host them every year, but the event grew out of control as I felt compelled to invite everyone I knew, numbers crept into the stratosphere, I spent a fortune and had to hire help to run the thing. After a six-year hiatus, and confined by a cottage that limits party numbers to a maximum of about 20, it was time to return to holiday party giving. After all, with the Fourth falling on a Saturday, how could I resist?
First thing in the morning, I decked the house in full patriotic regalia. Which must have been quite a thrill for all those Americans who were, no doubt, on many the Windsor tour buses that run outside my windows all day. Sitting room and garden sported flags, streamers and decorative geegaws, many of which had been in storage since my patriotic entertaining heyday. (The best is my dancing Uncle Sam, who is so amusing he stays in my bathroom window all year long.)
Only two Americans, besides myself, attended. The rest were Brits, charmed and excited to be part of the foreign rituals. Don't scoff ... how excited would you be if a Frenchman invited you to a proper Bastille Day party, or an Australian invited you 'round for Anzac Day? The piquancy is in the novelty, not in the actual event. It is always amusing to see what people enjoy. What's the favourite dish? What's too exotic to be tried?
Unsurprisingly, the iced tea wasn't touched. That adulteration of a national staple seems a bridge too far for most Brits. Or maybe it was just that nobody was interested in stimulants as mild as caffeine when alcohol was on offer. (The morning-after bottle count: 15 white wine, 4 red, more than 45 beers. 21 people.) The boxes of Cracker Jack didn't get much traffic, and my one healthy salad option ... cucumber, roast tomato and mozzarella pearls in a light vinaigrette ... was barely touched.
The Velveeta queso dip, however, was greeted with amazement and delight. Good thing nobody saw the box with the "pasteurized cheese product" label it started in. The crowd wiped out my baked beans. Never a surprise, considering that most Brits never bother doing anything to them but pouring them out of the tin. I went for two versions of coleslaw: Memphis-style, a mustard-based version off marthastewart.com and my own copy of the cranberry and apple-spiked version served at Missouri's Chandler Hill Winery. Clearly, my friends have been here enough to know to always come to my house hungry. Thus they powered through the majority of four pounds worth of Ball Park Franks and 30 jumbo burgers. People here aren't used to burgers with much more than straight beef in them, so mine ... doctored with a mix of Ro-tel, A1 sauce, bread crumbs, eggs and my secret spice mixture ... won many kudos. Call it simple, even call it white trash, but sometimes you just can't beat a basic barbecue.
My trivia quiz proved far too hard, showing once again that my idea of "general knowledge" bears little resemblance to reality. I must, however, go on record with shock and amazement that not a single Brit attending the party was even aware of the existence of the War of 1812. They've only fought two wars against us, for Pete's sake, and they managed to burn Washington in that one. You'd think that would figure in the curriculum someplace. Anyway ... congratulations to Suzy Christopher for combining her own knowledge with a dogged pursuit of the Americans at the party to get 18 of 20 answers. Thus winning the finest American flag baseball cap Wal-Mart had to offer. Hey, this was a classy gig! (Scroll to bottom for answers to quiz.)
For this American, the highlight of the evening had to be the fireworks. What's legal in this country is quite astonishing compared to what you can lay your hands on in the States. Just four fireworks and a handful of rockets were all we needed for a display that looked properly professional. Consider that the rockets created smaller versions of the bursts you see in big civic shows, and those individual fireworks were multi-shot arrays, the largest sending 180 fountains of sound and colour out of just one box. My lovely next-door neighbours earned my undying gratitude by lending us their garden for the critical 30 minutes of pyrotechnics, avoiding the near crisis I encountered when the fireworks vendor told me it was illegal to use fireworks in public parks. So much for the original riverside plan.
Hopefully we did not keep those lovely neighbours up as the action continued into the wee hours. I at least managed to move the late-stayers indoors before we rolled into the Bruce Springsteen karaoke. Then again, perhaps hearing my beautiful rendition of "Born to Run" would have been an appropriate thank you?
Having done my bit for trans-Atlantic relations, I hit my pillow at 3am, and was back up at 9 to clean up a prodigious mess. The ambassador really should give me a medal. Or maybe an invitation to the embassy's famous 4th of July party next year.
Bet they don't have any Velveeta there, though. We know where the real party is.
________________________________
TRIVIA QUIZ ANSWERS
1. Two 2. Chicago 3. Tamales 4. Gary, Indiana 5. Basketball, Cleveland Cavaliers 6. War of 1812 7. Bears 8. Minnesota 9. The Colorado River 10. Michigan 11. St. Augustine, Florida 12. Jellystone Park 13. Marines 14. LL Bean 15. Mt. Rushmore 16. The United Nations 17. Coca Cola 18. Philadelphia 19. Composer of patriotic music 20. Baseball Hall of Fame
It's been a while since my last Fourth of July party. I used to host them every year, but the event grew out of control as I felt compelled to invite everyone I knew, numbers crept into the stratosphere, I spent a fortune and had to hire help to run the thing. After a six-year hiatus, and confined by a cottage that limits party numbers to a maximum of about 20, it was time to return to holiday party giving. After all, with the Fourth falling on a Saturday, how could I resist?
First thing in the morning, I decked the house in full patriotic regalia. Which must have been quite a thrill for all those Americans who were, no doubt, on many the Windsor tour buses that run outside my windows all day. Sitting room and garden sported flags, streamers and decorative geegaws, many of which had been in storage since my patriotic entertaining heyday. (The best is my dancing Uncle Sam, who is so amusing he stays in my bathroom window all year long.)
Only two Americans, besides myself, attended. The rest were Brits, charmed and excited to be part of the foreign rituals. Don't scoff ... how excited would you be if a Frenchman invited you to a proper Bastille Day party, or an Australian invited you 'round for Anzac Day? The piquancy is in the novelty, not in the actual event. It is always amusing to see what people enjoy. What's the favourite dish? What's too exotic to be tried?
Unsurprisingly, the iced tea wasn't touched. That adulteration of a national staple seems a bridge too far for most Brits. Or maybe it was just that nobody was interested in stimulants as mild as caffeine when alcohol was on offer. (The morning-after bottle count: 15 white wine, 4 red, more than 45 beers. 21 people.) The boxes of Cracker Jack didn't get much traffic, and my one healthy salad option ... cucumber, roast tomato and mozzarella pearls in a light vinaigrette ... was barely touched.
The Velveeta queso dip, however, was greeted with amazement and delight. Good thing nobody saw the box with the "pasteurized cheese product" label it started in. The crowd wiped out my baked beans. Never a surprise, considering that most Brits never bother doing anything to them but pouring them out of the tin. I went for two versions of coleslaw: Memphis-style, a mustard-based version off marthastewart.com and my own copy of the cranberry and apple-spiked version served at Missouri's Chandler Hill Winery. Clearly, my friends have been here enough to know to always come to my house hungry. Thus they powered through the majority of four pounds worth of Ball Park Franks and 30 jumbo burgers. People here aren't used to burgers with much more than straight beef in them, so mine ... doctored with a mix of Ro-tel, A1 sauce, bread crumbs, eggs and my secret spice mixture ... won many kudos. Call it simple, even call it white trash, but sometimes you just can't beat a basic barbecue.
My trivia quiz proved far too hard, showing once again that my idea of "general knowledge" bears little resemblance to reality. I must, however, go on record with shock and amazement that not a single Brit attending the party was even aware of the existence of the War of 1812. They've only fought two wars against us, for Pete's sake, and they managed to burn Washington in that one. You'd think that would figure in the curriculum someplace. Anyway ... congratulations to Suzy Christopher for combining her own knowledge with a dogged pursuit of the Americans at the party to get 18 of 20 answers. Thus winning the finest American flag baseball cap Wal-Mart had to offer. Hey, this was a classy gig! (Scroll to bottom for answers to quiz.)
For this American, the highlight of the evening had to be the fireworks. What's legal in this country is quite astonishing compared to what you can lay your hands on in the States. Just four fireworks and a handful of rockets were all we needed for a display that looked properly professional. Consider that the rockets created smaller versions of the bursts you see in big civic shows, and those individual fireworks were multi-shot arrays, the largest sending 180 fountains of sound and colour out of just one box. My lovely next-door neighbours earned my undying gratitude by lending us their garden for the critical 30 minutes of pyrotechnics, avoiding the near crisis I encountered when the fireworks vendor told me it was illegal to use fireworks in public parks. So much for the original riverside plan.
Hopefully we did not keep those lovely neighbours up as the action continued into the wee hours. I at least managed to move the late-stayers indoors before we rolled into the Bruce Springsteen karaoke. Then again, perhaps hearing my beautiful rendition of "Born to Run" would have been an appropriate thank you?
Having done my bit for trans-Atlantic relations, I hit my pillow at 3am, and was back up at 9 to clean up a prodigious mess. The ambassador really should give me a medal. Or maybe an invitation to the embassy's famous 4th of July party next year.
Bet they don't have any Velveeta there, though. We know where the real party is.
________________________________
TRIVIA QUIZ ANSWERS
1. Two 2. Chicago 3. Tamales 4. Gary, Indiana 5. Basketball, Cleveland Cavaliers 6. War of 1812 7. Bears 8. Minnesota 9. The Colorado River 10. Michigan 11. St. Augustine, Florida 12. Jellystone Park 13. Marines 14. LL Bean 15. Mt. Rushmore 16. The United Nations 17. Coca Cola 18. Philadelphia 19. Composer of patriotic music 20. Baseball Hall of Fame
Saturday, 4 July 2009
A July 4th Quiz to test your AQ (Americana Quotient)
The weather's dancing between fine and cloudy, the coleslaw is made, the burgers and hot dogs are piled up and a flag hangs from my front windowbox. Happy Birthday, America, from a daughter across the pond. From the smiles I've received as people drive by my stars-and-stripes bedecked cottage, I'd say there's no hard feelings from the Brits from whom we cast off 233 years ago.
About twenty of those Brits (along with two American and an Australian) are coming over for a traditional BBQ tonight. It will feature an American trivia quiz. You can give it a try in advance of its formal debut. Answers tomorrow.
_________________
ELLEN'S FOURTH OF JULY QUIZ
1. How many lights was Paul Revere to flash from the church tower if the British were attacking by sea?
2. Route 66 wound from where to LA?
3. At Christmas parties in Texas, what item of Tex Mex cuisine is a traditional holiday dish?
4. From what city did Michael Jackson and his family come?
5. What sport does the man wearing the logo at right play? (Bonus points for the city and team name.)
6. The US national anthem, the Star Spangled Banner, commemorates an event in which war?
7. What do the flags of Missouri and California have in common?
8. What state is known as the Land o' Lakes?
9. What do Hoover Dam and the Grand Canyon share?
10. What is the largest blueberry-growing state in the USA, with 18,000 acres in production?
11. What is the oldest continually-occupied, European-founded city in the USA, established in 1565?
12. Where does Yogi Bear live?
13. To what group does the person wearing the insignia at right belong?
14. At what retailer are you most likely shopping if you are visiting Freeport, Maine?
15. What’s the biggest thing to see in Rapid City, South Dakota?
16. There's only one place within the borders of the continental US where other flags are legally entitled to fly at the same height as (as opposed to lower than) the Stars and Stripes. Where is it?
17. What do you get for free at the roadside rest stops on the Georgia border?
18. While visiting which city would eating a cheesesteak sandwich be considered an essential part of the tourist experience?
19. What role does John Phillip Sousa play in to many July 4 celebrations?
20. What are you most likely to be visiting if you travel to Cooperstown, New York?
About twenty of those Brits (along with two American and an Australian) are coming over for a traditional BBQ tonight. It will feature an American trivia quiz. You can give it a try in advance of its formal debut. Answers tomorrow.
_________________
ELLEN'S FOURTH OF JULY QUIZ
1. How many lights was Paul Revere to flash from the church tower if the British were attacking by sea?
2. Route 66 wound from where to LA?
3. At Christmas parties in Texas, what item of Tex Mex cuisine is a traditional holiday dish?
4. From what city did Michael Jackson and his family come?
5. What sport does the man wearing the logo at right play? (Bonus points for the city and team name.)
6. The US national anthem, the Star Spangled Banner, commemorates an event in which war?
7. What do the flags of Missouri and California have in common?
8. What state is known as the Land o' Lakes?
9. What do Hoover Dam and the Grand Canyon share?
10. What is the largest blueberry-growing state in the USA, with 18,000 acres in production?
11. What is the oldest continually-occupied, European-founded city in the USA, established in 1565?
12. Where does Yogi Bear live?
13. To what group does the person wearing the insignia at right belong?
14. At what retailer are you most likely shopping if you are visiting Freeport, Maine?
15. What’s the biggest thing to see in Rapid City, South Dakota?
16. There's only one place within the borders of the continental US where other flags are legally entitled to fly at the same height as (as opposed to lower than) the Stars and Stripes. Where is it?
17. What do you get for free at the roadside rest stops on the Georgia border?
18. While visiting which city would eating a cheesesteak sandwich be considered an essential part of the tourist experience?
19. What role does John Phillip Sousa play in to many July 4 celebrations?
20. What are you most likely to be visiting if you travel to Cooperstown, New York?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)